Agency Field Guide
Menu

The buyer's field guide

What good marketing agency reporting looks like

A good marketing agency report explains what changed, why it matters to your business, what the agency believes caused it and what should happen next. It makes the data and uncertainty visible, assigns owners to decisions and connects marketing activity to commercial consequences.

You should finish reading with a clearer decision. If you only know that several lines went up, the report has left the hard work with you.

Start with the decision page

Ask for a short summary with the business objective, current performance, major changes, interpretation and next actions. Detailed channel reporting can follow.

SectionWhat it should contain
ObjectiveThe business condition the engagement is meant to improve
PerformanceActual versus target, consistent comparison periods and relevant costs
ExplanationWhat changed and which explanations are supported or uncertain
DecisionsWhat to increase, reduce, stop, investigate or leave unchanged
OwnershipWho acts, who approves and when the decision is needed
RisksData problems, delays and constraints that affect the recommendation

Reports should also close the loop on the previous period's commitments. Did the proposed test run? Was the landing page shipped? If not, the next report should explain the effect on the plan.

Test whether a KPI deserves its place

Tim Kilroy's Hit/Miss/Blow Past test asks what happens to the business when a metric hits its target, misses it or substantially exceeds it. Buyers can use that test to challenge a report's headline measures.

If an increase in leads does not produce more qualified opportunities, investigate the connection. If more email revenue is accompanied by deeper discounts and weaker contribution, the headline alone is incomplete.

Keep business results, diagnostic measures and delivery measures distinct. Revenue and contribution describe economic performance. Conversion rate and qualified-lead rate can help diagnose it. Published pages and completed creative tests describe work done. Each can be useful; they support different decisions.

A leading indicator is a hypothesis about what comes next. Test its relationship with the outcome and revisit it as conditions change. Correlation is useful evidence, but it does not by itself prove the metric caused the result.

Require definitions behind the numbers

Every headline metric needs a source, formula, owner and reporting period. Define whether revenue is gross or net of refunds and discounts. Define a new customer, a qualified lead and an opportunity. Specify time zones, currency conversion and treatment of late-arriving data when they matter.

Record attribution windows and changes to them. Google Ads documents how conversion windows affect which interactions receive conversion credit. A changed window can disrupt comparison even if customer behavior has not changed. Google Ads conversion windows.

Ask for a change log covering tracking, consent configuration, campaign structure and major commercial events. Otherwise a tracking repair can look like a sudden improvement in marketing.

Reconcile the channels to the business

If two platforms claim credit for the same purchase, adding their totals overstates sales. Ask the agency to reconcile platform views with your commerce or CRM records and explain why figures differ.

Keep three views separate where available: the business's recorded results, the attribution systems used for optimization, and experimental evidence about incremental impact. They need not match perfectly to be useful. They do need clear labels.

Klaviyo, for example, describes settings that affect whether email opens, including Apple privacy opens, contribute to conversion attribution. Ask which settings apply to your account before interpreting the reported revenue. Klaviyo conversion tracking.

A useful report can describe an uncomfortable month

Consider this hypothetical B2B report. It uses mature, comparable lead cohorts rather than treating this week's leads as though every sale should already be closed.

MeasurePrior cohortCurrent cohort
Campaign spend$12,000$12,000
Leads120150
Sales-accepted opportunities2415
Cost per lead$100$80
Cost per accepted opportunity$500$800

The report should investigate the deterioration in opportunity production. A useful next step might be checking rejection reasons by campaign, reviewing sales follow-up and testing whether a new offer attracted the wrong audience. The table alone cannot establish which explanation is correct.

An actionable recommendation names the investigation, owner and decision threshold. For example, the agency and sales lead might review rejected leads before reallocating spend. The report should preserve contrary evidence too: slower sales response could be part of the problem.

Celebrating the cheaper lead without examining the rest of the chain would mislead the buyer about performance.

Make uncertainty explicit

Ask the agency to separate observations from explanations. “Conversion fell after the site update” is an observation. “The update caused the decline” needs stronger evidence.

Small samples, seasonality, promotions, audience changes and delayed conversions can affect conclusions. A useful report explains which decisions can proceed despite uncertainty and which need more evidence. You do not need a ceremonial confidence interval on every chart; you do need the agency to avoid pretending a noisy result is settled fact.

Keep access after the report arrives

You should have appropriate access to the underlying business and marketing accounts, the definitions and the reports. Agree on what exports and documentation you receive if the relationship ends. Respect any legitimate licenses covering the agency's proprietary tools while ensuring your business records remain usable.

A dashboard login is convenient. The ability to understand and continue the measurement process is more important at handoff.

Set a reporting rhythm that fits the decision

Operational alerts may need immediate attention. Budget pacing may need weekly review. Strategic changes often need a longer observation period. Agree on the cadence based on risk and learning speed rather than the reporting software's default email schedule.

During hiring, request a redacted report from a period when results disappointed. Ask the delivery lead to walk through what changed afterward. That conversation exposes judgment, accountability and willingness to tell you something inconvenient.

For your next report, select one headline metric and ask what decision it supports. Then ask what evidence would make the agency change its recommendation. A competent partner should welcome the discussion, even when the answer needs more work.