What to Do When You Dislike Your Agency's Creative Work
If you dislike your agency's creative work, identify whether the problem is accuracy, fit with the brief, execution quality or personal preference. Explain the concern in terms the agency can investigate. Decide whether the work needs a correction, a revision, audience research or a new direction.
Download the editable worksheet (Markdown). Replace the bracketed prompts with your own details.
You do not have to approve work you cannot support. You do need to give the agency a fair explanation of what would make it suitable for the assignment.
Revisit what the work is supposed to achieve.
Read the approved brief before reviewing the creative. Check the audience, proposition, intended response and constraints.
Ask the agency to explain its reasoning. What does it expect the audience to notice, understand and do? Which customer insight or evidence supports the approach?
The IPA's BetterIdeas study summary identifies limited use of briefs and explicit criteria when evaluating ideas. Referring back to those criteria can help the client distinguish an execution problem from a change in its own expectations.
Describe the issue you can observe.
Replace a broad judgment with a specific concern. If the design feels confusing, identify which information is hard to find or which sequence is difficult to follow.
For example, in a hypothetical service advertisement, the company name may be prominent while the offer is unclear. The client can ask the agency to improve recognition of the offer without dictating every element of the layout.
If the issue is brand fit, identify the relevant brand principle and explain how the work conflicts with it. A brand guideline that nobody supplied before production may still matter, but introducing it late has consequences for the plan.
Separate a factual defect from a creative choice.
Incorrect information, broken functionality and missing required disclosures need direct attention. The agency should understand which corrections are mandatory and who can approve them.
A creative choice may have several defensible answers. A bold visual style or unfamiliar headline is not necessarily wrong because it differs from what the client expected.
Ask whether your reaction reflects the audience's needs or your own preferences. That question does not require you to ignore your judgment. It asks you to explain what the judgment is based on.
Choose an appropriate way to resolve uncertainty.
When a question concerns whether people understand a message, a carefully designed research session can help identify comprehension problems. Ask participants to explain what they understood without leading them toward the preferred answer.
A small qualitative exercise can reveal issues to investigate. It cannot reliably forecast campaign revenue or represent the entire market.
For live tests, agree on the hypothesis, measurement and limits before starting. Comparing versions while changing audiences, offers or spending can make interpretation difficult. Ask the agency to explain what the test can and cannot establish.
Decide whether revision can solve the problem.
Request a revision when the underlying approach fits the brief and specific changes can address the concern. Ask for a new direction when the approach itself conflicts with the agreed objective or rests on an unsupported assumption.
If the work follows the approved brief but the client now wants a different outcome, acknowledge the change. Use the brief-change process to assess scope, timing and fees.
Avoid requesting endless variations without settling the decision criteria. That consumes capacity while leaving both sides unsure what an acceptable result looks like.
Use this creative-evaluation worksheet.
Review the work independently before discussing differences with the agency.
- The intended audience is [group], and the work should help it understand [message].
- The desired response is [action], under the conditions described in [brief].
- The work communicates [observation], supported by [specific reference].
- We have confirmed [facts and requirements] with [qualified reviewer].
- Our concern is [issue], which may affect the audience by [consequence].
- We need [evidence or explanation] before deciding whether the concern is material.
- We recommend [approve, revise, investigate or replace the direction] because [reason].
- [Approver] will decide the next step after [required input].
Give the agency the resulting decision and the reasoning behind it. The feedback guide explains how to turn that decision into a usable revision request.